- Joined
- Jan 27, 2026
I've always been sort of aware that the standard 'loser has to' format where someone picks the loser has some biases in it, where female or popular users are more likely to be picked as the Loser than others. I've generally felt this to be more of a 'feature' than a 'bug', but I think there is space for making it a game of chance.
So thats how this thread is intended to work.
Poster #1 posts the task, and puts a d6 dice roll in a spoiler.
Ie:
ie:
Whoever out of the two rolls the lowest is the loser and has to do the task.
...oh, and in the result of a tie, as per the example? Well, both players 'lose'.
And poster #3 restarts the game as per #1, and we repeat over and over.
Sound like fun?
So thats how this thread is intended to work.
Poster #1 posts the task, and puts a d6 dice roll in a spoiler.
Ie:
Poster #2 Accepts the task, and rolls their own d6.Loser has to give a rimjob to a skunk.
Dice roller gadget goes here. For purposes of this example, it's a 4
ie:
Haha. I'd laugh to see you try that! You are on!
Dice roller gadget again. (For purposes of the example, it's another 4). This roll can be spoilered, but doesn't need to be for it to work.
Whoever out of the two rolls the lowest is the loser and has to do the task.
...oh, and in the result of a tie, as per the example? Well, both players 'lose'.
And poster #3 restarts the game as per #1, and we repeat over and over.
Sound like fun?
Last edited: