• Happy March, my kinky friends! 🌸
    Wow, this year is just moving right along! If you're looking for some mischief this month, we’ve got you covered.
    👉 Please vote on February's Monthly Mischief submissions:
    🗳️ February Monthly Mischief Voting
    The amazing @snoek has created a unique way to celebrate some "holidays" for March:
    🎭 Monthly Mischief – March 2026
    We continue the Guess the Member game with round 4:
    🔎 Guess the Member – Round 4
    Stay tuned for some fun Anniversary celebrations starting soon!
    On April 11, Kinky Wonderland turns ONE 🎉 and we’re planning plenty of ways to celebrate and get into trouble.
    In the meantime, stay kinky, stay safe, and be amazing.
    xx Butterfly

Boys VS Girls: Who's in charge?

Reply to thread
Sort by newest Sort by date
Let me propose this and see what yall think.

Both sides must ask before orgasm. If the other side catches you they score 10 points and you are denied for 6 hours. Additionally, you can edge for your side for 1 point per edge, however you must report the edges as soon as you finish your edging session. (No hiding how many you have completed to come in and save your side at the end of the week) Guys have 10 minutes to catch and deny girls and girls have 5 minutes to catch and deny guys.
 
Your proposal isn't very fair IMO. The handicap will demotivate the girls and might prove to be another loophole. I suggest this format:

Everyone will announce it here if they plan to masturbate, opposing sex can catch and forbid it within 5-10 minutes (I think 10 minutes might be too long with these notifications...) If they are caught, their masturbation will not happen, and can't ask again for 3 hours.

Because they lost, if a girl gets caught, she has to watch an hour of her favorite porn or read her favorite stories for an hour without touching. This way, they are not handicapped for the weekly challenges (maybe make this a permanent rule, Sweets!) but still get some extra frustration, which will only strengthen the desire for an orgasm.

If you manage to have a successful orgasm, (not sure about this part yet) you can either hand out some additional no touch porn/stories to a player of your choice or bench them from asking to masturbate for a set amount of time. (Half a day? A day?)

Side to stop most orgasms wins. Of course, teasing and taunting denied folk is highly encouraged.

I and SweetNSpicy will NOT bypass the challenge by having sex. We would have to catch each other to win, so it would be like dividing a number by zero anyway.

I think this is most balanced, fair, and still lets the loser feel they lost.

I also suggest these 2 additions to the rules in the opening post:

- While the winning sex may choose a topic that benefits theirs (such as men choosing soccer trivia etc), the losing sex should not be handicapped for next week's challenge. This prevents the frustration the ladies had this week.

- Have the weekly challenge edited into the post on the first page. Some newcomers might get confused easily if they can't find the official rules and explanation easily.

Just my 2 cents. I know I'm a traitor for suggesting my wife's idea, but I do think she has a solid point.
 
One comment on this idea that I just thought of is with more guys than girls playing, should each side be able to catch themselves to score a point for their team. That way the girls don’t end up with an advantage because they have less players asking.
 
I agree about the number of guys VS girls. That was the problem this week as well. I'll try to come up with something for that. I feel averaging it like we did the first week was kinda meh too tbh. We need something better. Maybe we need to make it less individual and more a team thing?

If anyone has any other suggestions for permanent guidelines/rules, this is a good time to speak up. 👍

Either way, I'll streamline the opening post and include the weekly challenge from now on. I'll also put in a timer so you can see when the week ends. I'm a moron for not doing so from the start tbh. 🤫
 
Not sure how feasible it would be, but maybe some sort of point tier? Harder challenges would get you more points over easy ones to hopefully add some balance. Winning/losing teams could get some sort of (dis)advantage to help balance things, too, maybe. I'm not sure how easy it would be to manage it all, though 😅
 
Why would you catch someone on your team, though?

I had the following ideas:

- Making it percentual. (ie: 75% of female orgasms stopped - 50% of male orgasms stopped)

- Extend catching time, but having a game decide if the person can cum. (ie: Girl: "I'm gonna squirt my brains out now". Boy: "Only if you beat me at battleship/chess/uno/whatever")

- Make it a team effort, so you get denied as a team (ie: "The girls are attempting to cum now...". Any boy: "Like hell they are lol")

What do you think?
 
Ah right. It stimulates infighting, though, which might be interesting.... :devilish:

Tbh, you did bring up a fair point with the numbers. Suddenly, I'm not 100% sure this is fair anymore. In its original form my idea would surely put the boys at a disadvantage...

I think the best solution is to think of team-based challenges, although that's kinda hard to properly balance with a fluctuating number of participants on both sides. 😅🤬
 
What about either side posts a game they are willing to go up against anyone in the other side. Winner of the game scores a point, but the girls have to accept a SMALL disadvantage in the game. For example if it’s battleship they have to give up the location of one ship or if dice roll girls roll 5 die guys get 6, highest sum wins.
 
What if you have to sign up in advance to get a headcount up you can use to average scores? Edges per person, smacks per person, etc. used as the metric per side. Although I guess you could also just count up manually instead of a signup. Advantages can be something like 1.5pts/edge or something, as well.

It could also make tracking forfeits the following week more…interesting.
 
MischiefIncoming said:
What about either side posts a game they are willing to go up against anyone in the other side. Winner of the game scores a point, but the girls have to accept a SMALL disadvantage in the game. For example if it’s battleship they have to give up the location of one ship or if dice roll girls roll 5 die guys get 6, highest sum wins.
Click to expand...
I like this a lot! Added advantage is that the disadvantage can be discussed on a case per case basis and if you make a bad choice it will only cripple you that one game and not the whole week. Because that's what killed it for me yesterday and today, not even having a illusion of hope. I'd be content with this solution. 👌 And god knows I love competitions! How do you think this thread came to be?

raptorclaw said:
What if you have to sign up in advance to get a headcount up you can use to average scores? Edges per person, smacks per person, etc. used as the metric per side. Although I guess you could also just count up manually instead of a signup. Advantages can be something like 1.5pts/edge or something, as well.

It could also make tracking forfeits the following week more…interesting.
Click to expand...
Averaging is fair, and we did it with the first challenge (the edges), but something felt off to me. I remember it as a very easy victory... Or have I just become an edging monster? 👾
 
-I like the idea of adding porn/ stories when caught so the person caught is motivated to continue when allowed.
-I think 6 hours is a long time to be stuck before being allowed to try again, might slow down posting a bit. Even 3 seems a pinch high to me but Im not really sure.
-I do like the idea of being successful would add more porn/stories or something else to increase the other teams general horniness.
-I am a sucker for games/bets so that could be fun...
-percentages could be a way to balance things out a bit. The number imbalance is a hard thing to make fair
-I agree that who ever wins shouldnt get to weight the game too much in their favor. I have to imagine this week was pretty rough for the girls as we could just spam rolls well they could not do so in the same way. Choosing an advantageous challenge without making the losers feel like they cannot win seems important to keep people motivated to try and not just give up and accept defeat
 
SweetNSpicy said:
Averaging is fair, and we did it with the first challenge (the edges), but something felt off to me. I remember it as a very easy victory... Or have I just become an edging monster? 👾
Click to expand...
Definitely a monster!! For me what kinda killed it on that first week was the late entries. I felt like it was a close competition going back and forth or atleast close and then people started coming in last min having been stockpiling edges all week and I kinda just tapped out. It was mentioned about having people sign up before hand which I also think is problematic in its own way. But I do think if someone is playing they should be posting that they are doing in some sort of a timely manner
 
I also wanna say I like the general discussion of next weeks task like this. Everyone gets to give their opinion, give feedback on how its going. I think it helps people feel invested in the coming week
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top